Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Kafati Díaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 05:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Abraham Kafati Díaz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO, specifically coverage by independent sources. A Google search yielded no results. A news search provided just two articles, both of which are in Spanish and appear to be lists of Honduran politicians who voted against a particular issue. The only mentions of him in English are on mirror sites that appear to have copied and pasted this article onto their own pages. Amccann421 (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep He is the deputy of the National Congress of Honduras. I believe that this makes him notable and it seems inconceivable that he has not had significant media coverage given his senior position in the Honduran government. It is hard to find material on him, but this is common for even quite significant people in non-English speaking countries. I say that the article be left until someone who knows more about Honduras can advise. We shouldn't just delete articles out of ignorance. Ross-c (talk) 04:58, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, member of a national legislature easily passes WP:POLITICIAN. --Soman (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  14:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  14:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Per WP:SKCRIT Part 3. WP:NPOL states: "Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature" are inherently notable. AusLondonder (talk) 18:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a member of a national legislature. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:NPOL per above. I'll see if I can find more sources to add. Ajraddatz (talk) 06:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep But better sources need to be in the article. It looks like there are some available, more as a politician than businessman.RockyMtChai (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Members of national congresses are default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Confirmed member of the national legislature of a sovereign country, WP:NPOL #1 passed on its face. Keep and flag for reference improvement. Bearcat (talk) 23:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.