Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Solomonick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:48, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Abraham Solomonick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Waiting with an academic notability tag for four years; I think it's time we discussed this BLP on the basis of the subject's notability. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 07:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

SBaker43 (talk) 06:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC) 
 * Keep. I see 10 hits on Scholar; an entry at ru: Соломоник, Абрам Бенцианович with incoming Main links; and several Google books (not Wikipedia sourced) . He should have Israeli articles in Hebrew from the Ministry of Education. He certainly looks notable to me.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep and get someone to add sources in Hebrew or Russian. Let's not be so English language-centric.  people can become well-known in other languages, and it is useful for monolingual Anglophones to be able to check them out on Wikipedia.ShulMaven (talk) 15:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 07:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep As per SBaker43 and ShulMaven.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.