Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abridged Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 18:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Abridged Series

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The Yu-gi-oh series mentioned was deleted by AFD a while back for lack of notability, and has been recreated and deleted and salted repeatedly (Under many varient titles) since then. This article mentions other, likely similarly non-notable YouTube series, but is again mostly a YAS article. It wasn't notable on it's own, and it's not notable dressed up like this, sorry. TexasAndroid 13:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This specific use of the term cannot be verified by reliable sources. -- Satori Son 13:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Satori Son. Also, can I get some salt on those deletion fries? If it's been repeatedly recreated and deleted, it should be salted (again).  NA SC AR Fan 24 (radio me!) 15:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Large heap of salt already piling up here. We can just add this one to the heap, assuming it ends in Delete. - TexasAndroid 16:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per Satori Son. As popular as these are, they still have no real world relevance. JuJube 21:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Just how many times are we going to delete articles related to this? Almost of all of these kinds of fan parodies never meet Notability, much less the idea itself. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 01:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Salt per TexasAndroid. CRGreathouse (t | c) 02:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt In fact, this should be done (as speedily as possible) under any additional titles the creator happens to think up. Since this appears to be a persistant, targeted wikipedia spam/vandalism campaign, associated accounts should be blocked. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm watching for more direct reposts of the YTAS series, and G4 delete/salting them as I find  them.  This one was different enough, being about the classification of these series rather than about YTAS itself, that I did not feel comfortable with it as a G4.  And it's not one of the types of things that qualify for A7 either.  So I felt it needed/deserved it's own AFD. - TexasAndroid 21:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.