Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abro (tribe)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to take action, either on this article or the wider scope as proposed subsequently. I would suggest an RFC to be held, well-advertised, to discuss a potential new structure for these articles as being the best way forward. Daniel (talk) 23:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Abro (tribe)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Do we really need a standalone WP article on each and every tribe that exists on this planet? Fails WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 00:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 00:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


 * It is a major tribe of the Sindh region of Pakistan and they are a branch of a former ruling dynasty. You should avoid speed nominating multiple articles without hesitation and get yourself familiarized with South Asian caste related articles. Perhaps engage in a talk page discussion first with major contributors. Sir Calculus (talk) 05:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Draftify and merge region wise all similar articles after RfC @ WT:PAK:
 * Though I would share main concern. I suppose it needs deeper collective thought. I do not see any WP:RFCBEFORE to have taken place at Talk:Abro (tribe) or rather better would have been at WT:PAK.


 * Category:Sindhi tribes likely to have more than 250 similar stubs. The way articles seem to have formed I can imagine similar would be the case for many in Category:Tribes of Pakistan. Though there is one central article Ethnic groups of Pakistan it's scope does not seem to be tribal specific.


 * I am surprised region wise central articles for tribes of Pakistan do not exist but such large number of stubs going no where seem to exist. Baradari (brotherhood) system is influential cultural part of Pakistan and that article too is a stub. Tribal and ethnicity antecedents form clan culture / Baradari (brotherhood) so anthropologically it's important core of Pakistan's demographic history. Though not paid enough attention to on WP.


 * Idk if any similar articles were listed and deleted up til now but my suggestion is Draftify and merge  region wise all similar articles after RfC @ WT:PAK. If no one is ready to work on the drafts then put in my user name space I shall try to promote for expansion in due course. &#32;Bookku    (talk) 05:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi! Is it really possible to merge all region wise articles? There are many which may not be suitable for a single list-like descriptive article publishing. Jadeja, Kalhora, Soomro, Jokhio, Bhutto, Burfat are some examples. Sir Calculus (talk) 12:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Well developed ones need not be merged. Even for region list may be long but it can be further divided tribal district wise because many tribes are likely to be concentrated in few districts only. May be you can have separate article for extinct tribes. End of the day AfD is would not be right venue to take a detail call but project notice board would be IMO. &#32;Bookku   (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette Edit! 23:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, assuming good faith sourcing. It's not the worst I've seen. 16:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.