Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Absana
Same reason as Aaron Myung. CS players are NN. :: Colin Keigher 08:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Daniel Olsen 08:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy I get just 19 unique Google hits for Absana +"Counter-Strike". Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  10:35, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. NawlinWiki 13:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -MrFizyx 20:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Starblind. Prolog 00:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep known to make several public appearances around Australia at international events including ESWC. Inventor of the quick-scope method which will be a very important thing in the history of e-sports, which I am sure you will all agree is gaining popularity rapidly. The term "Absana" now a commonly used slang term on gaming servers mainly around Australia and various IRC gaming networks - Even cited on Urban dictionary recently - one of the reasons this was finally written for him. Winner of noticable competitions in past such as Mayhem - In 4e during finals against function zer0 (both teams anyone interested in e-sports south of the equator would know about) --- Harris06 09:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 19:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Just because it is big in some bloody game does not mean that it's notable. It's an unknown catchphrase and nothing but. :: Colin Keigher 05:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The point is not notability. The point we should be focusing on is whether enough neutral people have commented on the term to allow it to pass our actual policies, not our "Notability" essays. Ans e ll  03:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.