Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absheron Museum of History and Local Studies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Baku. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Absheron Museum of History and Local Studies

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't find sources to show this meets WP:N, or a good WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 15:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   03:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * if the sourcing in the interwiki links isn't sufficient, add a mention and redirect to Baku which lists the city's other museums. Star   Mississippi  16:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge a properly sourced summary to Baku. Found nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. If sources develop, the history will be here, if someone finds WP:THREE, ping me.  // Timothy :: talk  22:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge Per the lack of coverage in secondary sources. There are also some formatting errors in the article; I wonder if it might be better draftified but the subject itself doesn't seem to be independently notable.  GuardianH (talk) 14:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.