Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absolute reach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Reach (advertising). Courcelles 06:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Absolute reach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced entry that is close to a dictionary definition, except that it's too inconsistent to be one (it defines an absolute figure as a relative one). Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 22:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I cannot find a supporting reliable source, either. But one doesn't need administrator tools to fix this.  This is dead easy to fix with just the edit tool.  "reach" is a marketing concept, which can be absolute.  So this is a perfectly valid redirect to reach (advertising).  In fact, I have a sneaking suspicion that that was what the original editor was vainly grasping at.  Uncle G (talk) 22:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Uncle G. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.