Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AbsolutelyAsians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedily deleted by East718 per CSD G7, author requested deletion. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

AbsolutelyAsians

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Absolutely no notability  RT | Talk 14:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

How is it no notability? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woogyman (talk • contribs) 14:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: please read our Web content notiblity guidelines.  RT | Talk 14:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I find it hard to accept a Youtube video to be notable. &Lambda;ua&int;  Wi  se  (Operibus anteire) 14:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, according to the creater he said, he's using YouTube as a host because he wanted to appeal to younger youtube users/audiences using comedy to address issues such as friendship in future episodes! Woogyman (talk) 14:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Web content notability wants it to be referenced (in a newspaper article, etc), there are no such references in the article  RT | Talk 14:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete Just another YouTube video. Completly fails WP:WEB.  STORMTRACKER    94  Go Sox! 15:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. Added this AFD's tag to List of AbsolutelyAsians Episodes. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. Notability outside of YouTube not established. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, i agree with you. Its a YouTube video and theres no notability! You can delete it! Woogyman (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Change to speedy per author's comment above! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete both per author request and as completely non-notable web content (A7) Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per discussion above. The show is non-notable and the article lacks reliable sources as references. Majoreditor (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, advert. JJL (talk) 19:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete both. Non-notable. I tagged the list article with a speedy, but a well-meaning editor took it down as falling under the curent ArbCom issue over articles about television show episodes. I don't think that applies, since these "shows" are on YouTube and not broadcast or cable television. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per author's comments above+YouTube videos are very rarely notable, and this is not. contribs STYROFOAM☭1994 TALK 21:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: author requested. -- ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 19:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.