Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absolutist Games (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Notability is not temporary, but consensus can change. It seems to have changed in this case Fritzpoll (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Absolutist Games
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable organization with no reliable sources at all. This was listed for AFD years back and kept with a small number of votes with no real rationale fitting Wikipedia notability standards given, and there's been no change to the lack of notability since then. DreamGuy (talk) 14:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - This company easily passes WP:CREATIVE for the many successful and notable games that they created, including (most obviously) the game "Bubble Shooter". This article was kept as notable in 2006. Notability is not temporary. Varbas (talk) 13:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability via reliable sources—notability isn't inherited, either. If sources exist to show the notability of the company and not merely its games, they should be shown. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 13:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since no reliable sources discuss this company in any fashion that might help establish notability for it.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.