Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstraction physics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 21:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Abstraction_physics
This page appears to be (a) original research, (b) entirely unsupported by academic research or real-world practice, and (c) incoherent. It's my belief that it's not appropriate for Wikipedia, and should be considered for deletion. Rob 14:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete- this is an essay, not an encyclopedia article. The El Reyko 20:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. If it's heavily edited and published in a peer-reviewed journal, and subsequently becomes notable, it may be recreated down the line. Morgan Wick 23:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * delete. also [] as the wikipedia qualifications do not apply there either. T.Rue 02:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons stated by nominator. Cedars 09:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

re-evaluate - read comment in articles discussion. (Article Discussion was removed. A wikipedia fail that would otherwise have show the bias of the editors)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.