Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Jahl's contribution to the battle of Badr 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 06:36, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Abu Jahl's contribution to the battle of Badr
Article should be deleted and the information should be saved into Abu Jahl. His contribution at Badr was not notable enough to warrant him his own article on it. Pepsidrinka 02:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: previous AFD result was "no consensus", but the votes were "Merge", "Delete", "Keep or merge", "Interwiki or merge". I think nobody cared enough to do the actual merge. --Quarl 05:32, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * If possible, add Walid ibn Utba's contribution to the battle of Badr to this AfD. This should be merged to Walid ibn Utba. Pepsidrinka 02:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge to either Abu Jahl or Battle of Badr; delete article as named. If nobody is willing to do the merge, Delete, since it's mostly just some long quotes. --Quarl 05:32, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete apparent original research and far to narrow in scope. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 11:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to Abu Jahl. Isn't OR since the source hadith are quoted (assuming on good faith that the citations are indeed accurate). The other article on the other hand is a complete shambles and should be deleted. Zunaid 14:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Guy, and because nobody cares enough to merge it. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  22:12, Jan. 5, 2006


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.