Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Muhammad Ordoni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  18:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Abu Muhammad Ordoni

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The author does not appear to be notable and no assertions are made within the article. → AA (talk) — 10:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions.   -- → AA (talk) — 10:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletions.   -- → AA (talk) — 10:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep A quick google search shows up quite a number of reliable hits for this author. The information on this subject is also easily being verified as well. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 12:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * There are around 420 hits but none satisfy WP:BIO. Most of those hits are related to his book Fatima the Gracious and not on him. → AA (talk) — 13:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * In the event his book is notable, I would not consider it remiss myself to also have an article on the author of said book. This is because the association of a person with a book is sufficiently strong that the notability is deeply connected, even if the amount of information is as minimal as found on the dusk jacket.  Whether or not this book is notable enough for inclusion, I don't know, I'm just commenting on the author/book issue.  FrozenPurpleCube 21:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It is arguable whether the book would meet the WP:BK criteria. The article has been tagged for notability concerns since January 2007. It'd certainly not be sufficient enough for it's author to satisfy the WP:BIO criteria for a notable creative work. → AA (talk) — 21:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete NN. --PEAR (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per lack of sources Corpx 03:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources.Proabivouac 10:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable-- Sef rin gle Talk 03:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources; does not meet WP:N. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 03:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination due to lack of reliable sources. Yamaguchi先生 05:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.