Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Sayed Ansari Shaheb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:05, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Abu Sayed Ansari Shaheb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A lack of independent reliable sources available on this subject, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   04:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Lacks notability, and hardly any sources too.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 03:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete He's a mid-level clergyman without national notoriety in the UK. Of the sources, two appear to be directories or search engines or something, one is an advertisement for an event the subject was involved in and it just mentions his name and mosque, another one is a passing mention in a news story and the last is from the official website of the subject's organization. This seems like a WP:GNG fail as I really can't find anything not already in the article. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete – Per nom. Asserts basic notability, however, fails in the references department and hence doesn't cut the mustard for an article. —— Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 10:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:BIO guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 13:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete; no solid sources whatsoever. Nyttend backup (talk) 17:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Getting one's car vandalized does not make one notable. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:24, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable enough and looks promotional Sic Semper Tyrannis82 (talk) 21:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails BIO. - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  04:25, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Couldn't find notability, just some short bio. ///Euro Car  GT  23:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sources only show that the subject exists, not that he is notable for anything specific over and above that of any other Iman or lawyer. One worrying 'reference' is a blatant CV with land address, email address, and phone number - such outing details wrong for BLP, and certainly promotional. Acabashi (talk) 09:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - No fine source--Ciofeca (talk) 13:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.