Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abusive Aussie Husband/Battered Southern Wife stereotype


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete (note North Carolina vandal involvement) -- Curps 00:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Abusive Aussie Husband/Battered Southern Wife stereotype
Entirely original research as per WP:NOR. Big E 1977 20:51, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I like Aussies.Lomxa 20:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * comment above user created this article. IrishGuy 21:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. IrishGuy 21:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Rklawton 21:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Note that the author is using sockpuppets to add keep votes (which I've deleted beyond his original vote).  Tijuana Brass ¡Épa! - E@ 22:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment There does appear to be rather a few users who's contributions appear to be limited to commenting on this Afd, and nothing else. --TheMadTim 23:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No original research. And all the socks aren't really helping much either. Darquis 23:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 23:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * comment Shut up.Grog Drinker 23:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)\
 * Comment User's only edit.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 01:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Listen to me!AAH BSW 23:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment User's only edit.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 01:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep as this is a completely factual page.Good Old Southerner 23:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Please stop creating sockpuppet accounts. Their comments will be ignored when deciding whether to keep this article and you are only being disruptive. — GT 22:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete made up nonsense.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 01:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think battered Southern wives are cute.Awzee 03:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment User's first edit. You guys know your votes won't be counted right??ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 03:42, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't see why we can't. I think battered Southern wives are kinda cute too.Drinking Jeb 04:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just keep and everything will be fine...Ylogdad April 04:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment' User's first edit. You know that this vote will be ignored, right?ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 04:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. *drew 04:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 05:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Very strong delete -- this is terrible (and almost certainly a made up concept.) Wiki makes finding sockpuppeteers pretty easy... Grand  master  ka  06:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. --Metropolitan90 07:42, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and for God Sakes someone make a rule stating that only users with more than 100 edits can vote on AfD. --Roisterer 11:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment While I agree with the sentiment, you do know that making that requirement will only cause someone to go make 100 trivial edits (or worse, vandalize things) in order to get into an AfD? Darquis 14:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.