Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abyssal Engine and Tools


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mr.Z-man 16:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Abyssal Engine and Tools

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. (Currently) non-notable software / software company - fails WP:CORP. No third-party independent references. Article is almost an advert, and there is a potential COI with the author. CultureDrone (talk) 13:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete per nomination: game engine with no showing of notability. Badly written article full of peacock terms strongly suggest conflict of interest and spam. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Han-Kwang (t) 15:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 01:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Almost? I fail to see how it is different from an advert in any respect. Created by an SPA using the product's name, full of puffery, self-linking, no reliable sources. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.