Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academia Brasileira de Astrologia Védica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Academia Brasileira de Astrologia Védica

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No notability, no good source, propaganda JoaquimCebuano (talk) 01:40, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 November 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Brazil. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanispamcruftisement. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meet WP:GNG. Good sources in notable websites in Brazil 1 2. It is a non-profit organization also. Preceding unsigned comment added by ClaraCastilho79 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC) (blocked sock of ThelemaSanskrit93)
 * Keep. Good sources, good notability, non-profit organization, there is no need for propaganda. ThelemaSanskrit93 (talk) 20:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC) (blocked sockmaster)
 * Keep. Notable, relevant sources, same style of page adopted in Astrological Association of Great Britain article, there isn't any propaganda at all.MaryaReginaBR (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2022 (UTC) (blocked sock of ThelemaSanskrit93)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N and any other notability criteria. The article doesn't have even a single reliable source, all the keep votes are likely from paid editors (most likely socks) and two of the accounts (ClaraCastilho79 and MaryaReginaBR) were created solely to vote in this AfD and in another one (Articles for deletion/André Kërr) involving the president of this instituition. Obvious case of WP:SOAPBOX. Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 23:00, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Accounts ClaraCastilho79 and MaryaReginaBR are proven socks of ThelemaSanskrit93. Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 15:04, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Only passing (at best) references found; appears to have been created (along with the related André Kërr) without COI disclosure. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 15:49, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 05:42, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.