Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic Studies Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) MT Train Talk 05:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Academic Studies Press
'''*COMMENT: - Withdraw by nominator. ''' CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A publication house focuses on Jewish, Slavic, religious and etc scholarly works. All reference are either primary (own websites) or listing of books published by the company. A WP:BEFORE found no WP:RS to establishto meet WP:NCORP requirements.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 04:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 04:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I am very uncomfortable with deleting articles about serious academic publishers. This company has published works by at least nine notable authors and its books have won awards from at least four notable organizations. The Defending History reference, for example, is neither "primary" nor "listing of books" and neither are the references documenting awards won. That indicates to me that the nominator has not actually done their homework. This article is not garbage but is instead exactly the type of thing that an encyclopedia with 5.6 million articles should include. Improve it instead of deleting it. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  04:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, there is no such thing as "WP:NCROP". <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  04:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.