Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy Hill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Academy Hill

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:N AKS (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Undelete Could be left alone, too, or have people fill in the information that can do something besides Google the web and paste keyword search results in. People actually do in fact LIVE here and have no association with Chadwich School other than our lack of tolerance issues with its' crowds and noise twice a day clogging up our already small streets. Fortunately, The Information Highway does not employ its' Information Police from Google. If they did, immediately upon a hard drive crash or power failure, their world would go brain-dead instantaneously with zero hope for recovery.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.131.196.131 (talk) 02:09, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find reliable sources for this. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of coverage found at Google News or Google Books. Could be redirected/merged to Palos Verdes or Chadwick School. --MelanieN (talk) 03:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep if it can be found on a map such as google or the USGS, Delete otherwise.LuciferWildCat (talk) 19:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Recommended in the future that User:Luciferwildcat only bold one course of action to avoid conflict in gathering a concensus per WP:AFDFORMAT. Stubbleboy 20:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment, that just promotes laziness on the part of the closing admin, this is not a vote. The comments should be read to see if any of the keep arguments are valid and if they are it should be kept.LuciferWildCat (talk) 23:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Right, I never described it once as a vote. I'm simply relaying you information directly as it is posted under WP:AFDFORMAT.  If you want to make assumptions about what promotes laziness, that's your prerogative, not mine.  Stubbleboy 00:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nomination.  Stubbleboy 19:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. --Ifnord (talk) 15:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.