Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy of Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of organizations in Judge Dredd. Clear consensus for no standalone article. Redirecting to a list as an ATD; should not be reverted without substantial secondary sourcing. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Academy of Law

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with no rationale. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or at worst fully merge to List of organizations in Judge Dredd. Deleting information serves no useful purpose even if a standalone article is not kept. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Non-encyclopedic information should be deleted.If you want to keep as an independent article, please demonstrate independent, real-world (not "in-universe") notability. --Nicknack009 (talk) 12:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fictional. Not a shred of analysis. Pure PLOT. Fails GNG and NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 11:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.