Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 16:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No useful content, blocked user, small importance, unless someone wants to spend some time cleaning it up. Rarkenin (talk) 17:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep None of that is a reason for deletion. Although the amount of information is small, it is an exaggeration to say "No useful content". The fact that the editor who created the article has since been blocked is no reason for deletion either, and if it were then we would have to delete a hell of a lot of articles. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:08, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. High schools are, by convention, notable so there's something wrong with the world if universities aren't. Dricherby (talk) 21:12, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  01:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  01:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: In addition, it does not seem to be a block evasion. He created the article two hours before getting blocked. About "no content", the "stub" tag is doing its job! --Tito Dutta (contact) 22:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - There is now a redundant version of this article called Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR). Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 05:06, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tagged for speedy A10. Dricherby (talk) 08:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * An SPI should be in order too (in my opinion)! --Tito Dutta (contact) 08:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The A10 is declined and content merged as it was different. So now there is even more reason to keep. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, though at the time when I nominated for speedy, the only substantial difference between the articles was the uncited and vague claim to be some kind of "meta university", which I didn't think worth merging. Dricherby (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Government-funded, degree-awarding institution. Clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:31, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.