Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accelo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:00, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Accelo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I fail to find the in-depth independent coverage in multiple sources required by WP:CORPDEPTH. Rentier (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * delete, no sources beyond business-as-usual PR stuff. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Topic appears to fails GNG and WP:NCORP. References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing ++ 19:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.