Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acceptance Speech (Dance Gavin Dance album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, with no prejudice against merge or redirect if consensus develops that way. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:13, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Acceptance Speech (Dance Gavin Dance album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NALBUMS. It may do in the future, so I think it may benefit from being userfied. I did attempt to redirect it to band's article as a possible search term, but this was reverted. I think redirection to Dance Gavin Dance or deletion are both valid outcomes. Boleyn (talk) 19:47, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:11, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

It debuted at 42 on the Billboard 200, I think that makes it significant enough to remain. vbooy57 (talk) 15:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * That's a good point. On top of that, I think once it gets some references and more content on reception and reviews, it'll be fine. Give it time. WeinribZ, yo. (talk) 12:49, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Keep per vbooy57. Charting on the Billboard 200 definitely makes it meet WP:NALBUMS. It just needs more material, which will come in time.  Corvoe  (speak to me)  15:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC) 
 * Redirect to Dance Gavin Dance. How does charting on the Billboard 200 make it meet notablity requirements for albums? Charting in and of itself does not make an album notable. That info can be noted in the main article. It can always be recreated at a later date (and even kept before the end of this discussion) pending "significant coverage in multiple reliable sources". -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 01:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. The chart placements suggest the album may be notable, and there are two staff reviews at Sputnikmusic, which WikiProject Albums considers reliable, but I'm not seeing much else in terms of significant coverage.  Gong   show  18:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:47, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 15:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge to Dance Gavin Dance. Personally I don't feel that there is enough here for a standalone article, but the content should either be kept or merged to the band article. I don't see any benefit to the project from deleting this. --Michig (talk) 18:07, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: there are reviews. Tezero (talk) 05:50, 5 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.