Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Access Business Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. None who have commented have opined in favor of keeping this article, and multiple relists are discouraged. Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  04:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Access Business Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable Business, fails WP:CORP  Jay Jay Talk to me 00:08, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment It may be more fruitful to seek media coverage of the firm's trading name "abica": 2009 Scotsman article (though that is not sufficient for notability in itself). AllyD (talk) 17:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 21:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The 3rd party coverage that has been found (2009 Scotsman article on BT fibre deal and Herald article on local customer services award) are insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:14, 10 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete not enough coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH--William Thweatt TalkContribs 00:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.