Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Access to US Adoption Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Adoption disclosure. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Access to US Adoption Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Found this article while going through underlinked backlog. This article is not WP:NPOV -- in fact, it is written like an advocacy essay, complete with an image promoting a particular stance. Tonally and stylistically, it needs a complete re-write. Beyond the cleanup issues -- it's my opinion that there isn't any potential for an encyclopedic article on this topic, and the title isn't even a particularly useful redirect.  A  Train talk 09:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete and Redirect - To Adoption disclosure. The subject is addressed there. ShoesssS Talk 14:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Adoption disclosure. While it's true that the title probably won't be a useful redirect, they're WP:CHEAP, so it's hard to argue against creating it.  If not redirect, then certainly delete, as not meeting WP:NPOV.  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.