Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accessibility Inspector


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to VoiceOver. Courcelles 03:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Accessibility Inspector

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a very minor piece of software used for a very specific purpose. It has not received "significant coverage" in that it is only mentioned in instruction manuals/guides rather than articles written about the software itself so does not meet the notability guideline. James086 Talk 19:46, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete/merge. Delete the article but move its (minimal) content into a related page. Andrew327 07:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:07, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge I found one in-depth (about a page of material) secondary reference in the book The iOS 5 Developer's Cookbook, but that was it. Not quite enough notability for a standalone article. The utility has at least two uses: (1) VoiceOver simulation to test program accessibility and (2) to display GUI element info for use in AppleScript programming. There does seem to be enough notability to merge a subset of the article into the VoiceOver article, which is arguably the utility's most important use. Mark viking (talk) 04:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge per Mark viking. This page doesn't need to stand alone. The little green pig (talk) 23:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.