Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accounting’s Role in the Late 2000’s Financial Crisis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. J04n(talk page) 15:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Accounting’s Role in the Late 2000’s Financial Crisis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article appears to consist largely of the author's own synthesis of cited sources. Although the citations are good and solid, the author draws conclusions based on xyr own interpretation of the cited articles. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. I suspect that, as with Articles for deletion/Rational and Natural Theories of Management, this might be someone's homework. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Rename and keep, on second thought. The tone needs work, but this is mainstream history and worth saving.  I turned the "Background" paragraph into a head paragraph. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 05:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Very standard stuff, with lots of coverage saying these sorts of things. Could do with a rename perhaps to "Auditors". Also Fair value section perhaps should go to the bottom. Johnbod (talk) 17:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Rename and keep. Rename to Accounting and the late 2000's financial crisis. There seems to be valuable content (and a notable topic) we should preserve, despite the essayish tone. Biosthmors (talk) 17:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Rename and keep as above. If I understand correctly it also needs to be tagged for globalisation, because it appears to assume an US perspective. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.