Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AccuVein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

AccuVein

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 20:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep Haven't used it myself, but looks like its real. Article is NPOV, not advertising, appropriate links. Seems reasonable to keep. BakerStMD  T&#124;C 22:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Ethically  Yours! 12:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The article currently doesn't have the depth of coverage we would like, however, there are enough reliable sources out there to help improve the article. I added a few to the talk page. —  Noah  01:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.