Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accuquote


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Accuquote

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The NYT source is the only source that might contribute to WP:GNG, and even that is a fairly passing mention. Looking around for other sources, I'm mostly just seeing the company named in lists of insurance providers, and that sort of thing. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject of a lawsuit for unjust enrichment from pop-up ads, is about the best I can find, and it's also trivial coverage. They're mentioned, but no reliable coverage or anything at length about the company). 110 staff for an insurance brokerage isn't huge, that's quite small. The insurance company where I work has that number of people in their customer service department alone. There are many hits in Gnews but it's all advertising in Kiplinger's personal finance. Oaktree b (talk) 03:10, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies,  and Illinois.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG/NCORP  HighKing++ 19:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.