Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accuracy paradox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. I've speedy deleted this as a copyvio of Tilmann Bruckhaus, "The Business Impact of Predictive Analytics", in Zhu & Davidson (eds) Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

Our article was created in 2006. While the linked book above was published in 2007, gscholar shows three citations to a 2006 version of the paper, so a 2006 edition clearly exists. I will undelete on request if anyone wants to make a case that copying was the other way round.

The creator of our article was User:Tilmann.Bruckhaus, indicating there is also an element of promotion going on here. Bruckhaus may well have wrote this article, but clearly had assigned copyright to a publisher at the same time. SpinningSpark 17:48, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: A previous version of this article was deleted at Articles for deletion/Accuracy Paradox. SpinningSpark 14:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Accuracy paradox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced Roxy, the naughty dog . wooF 15:48, 23 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.