Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accutension


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 05:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Accutension

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence that this line of products is particualrly notable  DGG ( talk ) 08:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be advertising for this brand/app. The technique may be notable, but not this product/app brand which makes use of it. It fails WP:PRODUCT pretty much outright. The coverage of this app is almost non-existing. There is exactly one article at geektime.com (which I dont think is RS), and one article at the Japanese cnet (here). Apart from that there is 0 reception, not even in non RS: Since this is a software/app related product, I doubt there is additional coverage in offline media. Since this app fails WP:GNG very clearly, I think the article should be deleted. Dead Mary (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this suggests only existing as a listing so WP:NOT applies, basically nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  20:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.