Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace Edition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Ace Edition

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is some debate as to whether Genius is a reliable source in this context as per WP:RSPS. I have conducted a few searches and I can't find any coverage of this band outside Genius and other lyrics databases. Even searching in conjunction with the names of their several albums and several band members yields zilch. Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Please ping me if reliable sources showing significant coverage are found or reliable evidence of chart success. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Per related Articles for deletion/Bad Best Friends Boys For Life nom for a 'TV series' which is just Instagram videos of fake text threads...it's just another 'kids screwing with us' article and there won't be sources for this ever found.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Lyric-based websites cannot be used to establish notability, unless the website is part of a very notable source and the information is part of a news release. Multi7001 (talk) 03:15, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment In this case, the Genius page is 100% fake and completely user-generated. I could create a fake Genius page for whatever song I 'created' in the shower and state the 'inspiration' for the 'lyrics'.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:HOAX....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:35, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G3 as hoax. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - speedily if possible as per G3.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.