Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace engineering college


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify to Draft:Ace Engineering College. North America1000 05:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Ace engineering college

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable educational institution Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 12:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 12:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I know what WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES says, but this article is in A3 speedy delete territory as it stands. shoy (reactions) 13:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems that A3 does not apply here, as the criterion says that "this criterion does not cover a page having only an infobox". Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 14:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

And I found this: A page with this title has previously been deleted.
 * An article on this subject has already been deleted. ACE Engineering College

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

10:46, 20 September 2013 Jimfbleak (talk | contribs) deleted page Talk:Ace engineering college (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: G8: Talk page of a deleted page). Postcard Cathy (talk) 14:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: According to the college's website, some of its programmes are provisionally accredited by the National Board of Accreditation.source. How should that be interpreted re WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES? Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 16:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: College website can't be considered an independent source. Also, even if it is, it's not enough to establish a notability. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Shhh, don't say that to our staunch supporters of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. If it exists, it is enough for them to keep a page on a school of higher education, no matter how bad the sources are ;) - HyperGaruda (talk) 12:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Draft instead as I was split between delete and Keep as I examined the school's website here and while it's not quite clear, it seems there's at least enough to presume it's acceptable but it will of course need the improvements. Notifying for analysis.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:25, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 08:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to draft Notable, but not yet an acceptable article. Move to draft space.  DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.