Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acer Aspire (5633 WLMi)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Acer Aspire (5633 WLMi)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability. Purely original research; no references, primary, secondary, or third-party. TechOutsider (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello? Anyone reviewed this article yet? TechOutsider (talk) 21:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsdier


 * Delete. Doesn't assert notability. No references. -- samj in out 12:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment. Agree, per above and WP:OR; the creator mentioned some controversy over the product however never referenced a source. TechOutsider (talk) 19:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider


 * Weak delete: I'd been considering suggesting a merge back into Acer Aspire, which is horribly devoid of substantive content, but ... there's very little here to merge, since it's all uncited. Some Google News trawling returns 10 hits, but none is in English: perhaps a reader of Dutch could salvage something from the review here, but on that strength alone I don't think there's enough WP:RS coverage of this model to establish notability. Gonzonoir (talk) 09:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton  Talk  ·  Review  00:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not every product of a notable company is notable. That Belgian review is a few paragraphs, moderately positive, on something that we'd never call a reliable resource. Drmies (talk) 06:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.