Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achi, Arizona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Achi, Arizona

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Topo maps show "Achi (site)" at this location, but the closest search results I could find were newspaper articles about an ancient Hohokam village called "Gu Achi". The "Achi" name is not in use and is an unlikely search term, so a redirect is inappropriate. –dlthewave ☎ 03:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. –dlthewave ☎ 03:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. SMBMovieFan (talk) 04:11, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, per WP:GEOLAND. Listed as a "small permanent Papago village" in the Arizona Place Names book, plus additional US Bureau of Indian Affairs documentation.  References added to article. Definitely not the same as Gu Achi. RecycledPixels (talk) 00:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per .  Onel 5969  TT me 00:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Some sources state that Achi is actually Santa Rosa, Arizona. See p. 259 and here.  However, this source states that Santa Rosa was called "Kiacheemuck" on a census (p. 405), and Achi's location was "a trifle northeast of kiacheemuck" (p. 338).  This would pretty much be the location of Achi on a map, in relation to Santa Rosa.  This source from 1920 also places Achi "about a mile to the northeast" of Santa Rosa (p. 14). Both sources indicate this was a populated place. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep WP:GEOLAND pass. Lightburst (talk) 14:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.