Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acid Dreams- The Original


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Acid Dreams- The Original

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NALBUMS. Very rare item with only one source found to confirm its existence. Search reveals many other albums of same name but almost no third-party discussion of the album in question. It appears to have been mentioned in the book "Acid Dreams" by Martin A. Lee and probably really existed as a special promotional item featuring a few notable artists, but notability for the album itself is lacking. Also this article is functioning more as a a talk page with these same arguments. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 10:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not really an encyclopedia article, and the topic appears non-notable. Polarpanda (talk) 11:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The album appears to have been re-released in 2009, which earned it coverage here and here, which I believe, in addition to the PopMatters review already provided in the article, is enough to satisfy WP:NALBUMS. I also suggest removing "The Original" from the title and renaming it simply Acid Dreams.  Gongshow  Talk 18:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 19:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The three reviews noted above are plenty to demonstrate notability.--Michig (talk) 20:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - but article needs to be tidied up, spelling corrected etc.--Tris2000 (talk) 14:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have incorporated the above sources into the article. I still recommend changing the article's name to simply Acid Dreams, as none of the sources refer to the album as Acid Dreams - The Original.  Gongshow  Talk 00:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per Michig.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment from nominator. Everyone has good arguments and the article is now much better. I will attempt the suggested title change (move). The article is now worth keeping, in my book. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 07:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I, for one, really appreciate it when a nom takes a second look and -- where the fact support it, often w/new sources/articles, reversed himself.  It save other editors time.  Kudos to Doomsdayer.  If someone could close this as a keep that would help forestall further AfDs on the article, I imagine.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.