Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acision


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  19:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Acision

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A speedy deletion as blatant advertising was overturned at deletion review, to allow for an examination of the notability claims beyond the current problems of tone which I have partly remedied by removing the latest additions that triggered the speedy deletion. No further opinion from my side. Tikiwont (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep (or redirect to LogicaCMG) - I think they meet WP:CORP. There's a lot of press about them ,,,, and they have an extensive WP article under their old name LogicaCMG.   SIS   15:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I filed the DRV, and will quote my defense here: "The article isn't great and various stubs have been deleted before, but it's the the world's largest vendor of certain types of telco gear ($500m revenue last year), handling over half the world's SMS traffic, and definitely notable in its field. I'll undertake to improve the article if it's undeleted." I do not support merging it with Logica, because it's now a fully separate company. Jpatokal (talk) 16:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep if reliable sources can be found. Notability isn't in dispute here (assuming the article is true).  It needs to be watched for spam though. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Article makes strong claims of notability and does have sources. These can be improved with the hundreds of available articles out there about the firm. Alansohn (talk) 20:33, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.