Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ackerson theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   03:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Ackerson theory
speculative content, wikipedia isn't a crystal ball, uncylopedic, looks copied and pasted directly from somewhere Andeh 05:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This AfD nomination was incomplete, listing now. —  The KMan  talk 04:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pure nonsense. obviously copied and pasted.  -- Alphachimp   talk  05:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Here is the profane source of the offending gibberish Jammo (SM247) 05:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "Based off of Theories by Eagle 117 and opogjijijp" Posts to bulletin boards and Usenet, wikis or messages left on blogs, are never acceptable as primary or secondary sources.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   05:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense Chrisny2 06:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. --Coredesat 07:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonsense. --Terence Ong (talk 08:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete using a big editting gun. --Charlesknight 11:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, regrettably, this doesn't seem to qualify for speedy deletion as complete gibberish. It's someone's theory about the Halo novels, or a response to other's theories about them. I forget. These godawful articles all blend together after a while. Anyway, WP:OR and basically, WP:BOLLOCKS. - Motor (talk) 13:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per aboev. -- Xyra  e  l  T 17:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. &mdash; Khoikhoi 02:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense.--Auger Martel 08:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.