Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acorns & Merlot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete an non-notable. I will make the content available if requested. —Doug Bell talk 09:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Acorns & Merlot

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable podcast. No sources cited, original research. Also nominating:
 * for deletion; exact copy of Acorns & Merlot article above HowardSF -U­-T-C- 05:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete unless sources are added SUBWAYguy 06:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - where is the notability in this information?  BIGNOLE    (Question?)  (What I do)  03:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep conditionally - the users involved state the article is a work in progress. Seeing as the item in contention seems to display notability, I suggest we let the article go undeleted for a week or so to allow it to come up to standard. Besides, if the article gets deleted the article will need to be remade from the ground up, which is a pity because it needs to be part of the podcasting wikiproject (personal opinion). This podcast apparently beat the podcast "Nobody likes onions" on podcast alley, and if I recall Nobody likes Onions has an extensive article. It would be unfair to cut this article off from devlopment when it is already more notable than another article that has been firmly established.Optomal7 07:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC) — Optomal7 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep - 'At Home With Jennifer,' as well as a PPG, and Tartan source were cited for validity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creamsoda (talk • contribs) — Creamsoda (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete and userfy seems sensible here, per both HowardSF/Bignole/Subwayguy and Optomal7.  Daniel.Bryant  05:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and userfy. this is almost notable, but at the moment it fails WP:N because only one reliable source (i.e. not a blog) is used as a source. John Vandenberg 06:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is definitely as valuable or more valuable as other podcasts covered in the Wikipedia. They apparently have 2500 listeners a week and it is significant because they are one of the few all-student produced podcasts.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.