Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acoustic (Joey Cape and Tony Sly album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:17, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Acoustic (Joey Cape and Tony Sly album)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only present source is from their record label, zero significant coverage found. Found a few for Acoustic Volume Two (which is a different album in case that's not clear) so be wary of that if you go searching. Shame 'cause I love this album, but thems the breaks. QuietHere (talk) 08:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. QuietHere (talk) 08:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Did some more digging and found this from See Magazine, but that's still all I've got. Still can't see this article getting saved. QuietHere (talk) 10:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * At least assuming that random punk zine reviews like this one are no good. QuietHere (talk) 10:37, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Suspect nominator's right on the money here. Could use a line or two added to the Cape and Sly articles... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, came to same conclusion as nominator. Not notable per WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 17:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.