Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acoustic sound systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Acoustic sound systems

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Questionable notability, full of spelling and grammatical errors, virtually no wikilinks, inappropriate writing style (reads more like a magazine article) 52 Pickup (talk) 21:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete The reasons given in this AFD are entirely surmountable problems. However, I say delete anyway as it appears to fail WP:CORPORATE. -Verdatum (talk) 22:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 12:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable source to indicate notability of the company -- Whpq (talk) 16:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: There are several indicators that this company is either defunct, operating under a different name or insufficiently notable for inclusion here. First, there remains on the internet a 'page under construction' site for the company at http://www.acousticsoundsystems.co.uk/, which indicates that the page will be launched in Autumn 2005.  Second, the company is listed in several UK business directories, but the company website listed, http://www.assspeakers.com/, returns an 'access forbidden' response; granted, this may be a transient.  Finally, I searched local Essex web sites that were available, such as that for the Essex Gazette and the local Essex web presence, and found no mentions; often mentions in the bowels of sites like these are not fully indexed on Google (like news archives).  Based on all of this, I recommend deletion, understanding that negative results in searching do not mean there is nothing to be found.  The company might have been purchased or changed names, in which case a new article might emerge at a later date.  --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 12:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.