Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acquisitiveness (phrenology)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by RHaworth, CSD G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Acquisitiveness (phrenology)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Any referenced content (none!!) belongs at Phrenology and this article deleted. we are not a dictionary Roxy the dog. bark 15:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep or temporarily delete as long as the page is not brought up to a proper standard. This page, and the others about Phrenology faculties, were created as stubs but never finished properly, still work in progress. They should be completed with references from reliable sources and illustrations. There remains much work to be done. LHOON (talk) 19:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. It seems absurd to create a stub lacking sources in 2004, do no further work on it, and now call it a "work in progress". Please define "progress". (LHOON has copypasted the comment above also at Articles for deletion/Destructiveness (phrenology) and Articles for deletion/Ideality (phrenology), so I'm making the same comment there.) Bishonen &#124; talk 20:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC).


 * Tagged for speedy deletion - This is apparently a copyright violation from . - Sum mer PhD v2.0 21:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.