Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Front of National Socialists/National Activists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 17:31, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Action Front of National Socialists/National Activists

 * Delete - This page is non-notable and spam, it has only had one editor since its creation - Solar 18:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not because it has one editor but because it is not notable. I feel the number of editors should not be a criteria for deletion, rather the quality of the article should be the only factor which decides whether an article should stay or go. --Soumyasch 18:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed, I only mentioned that to underline my opinion the article is non-notable, thanks for your support. - Solar 18:24, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep (I am the creator and sole editor of the article). The ANS/NA was (and to some degree still is) an important organization in the German militant neo-Nazi scene. Many of its former members - many of which are alleged to still continue the organization - such as Christian Worch, are some of the most important figures in the German right-wing, Worch, e.g., even has influence in the National Democratic Party of Germany, which aside from being a hot topic in Germany, is even represented in the Saxon Landtag. This and the fact that there is also a corresponding article in the German wikipedia should be enough to constitute notability.--Carabinieri 20:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable neo-Nazi organisation, important in the early 80s and with large influence in the German Nazi scene later. I don't see what is spam about this article (the external link goes to a descriptive page on an anti-Nazi site). Kusma (討論) 21:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep German history isn't spam. A branch of the NSDAP isn't "non-notable". Saint|swithin 21:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep this seems notable enough to me. Way freaked out, but notable nonetheless --Deville (Talk) 01:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kusma. Angr (talk • contribs) 06:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Notbale enough to be kept in my book. Keresaspa 13:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep according to Carabinieri --KarlV 09:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.