Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actionreaction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete R2 by User:The Anome. ColourBurst 20:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Actionreaction
Spamvertising for nonnotable business; creator User:ACTIONREACTION unsurprisingly deprodded, so brought here. NawlinWiki 16:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Update Adding Actionreaction technology solutions to nom; duplicate article by same author. NawlinWiki 17:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Stong delete both - solely corporate promotion, few google hits --Nigel (Talk) 16:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

No Spamvertising going on here, nor is business nonnotable. Few Google hits due to misnamed article. Search "ACTIONREACTION Technology Solutions" ACTIONREACTION 17:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. Fails WP:CORP, and the editor is, in my opinion, a bad source of information (Attempting to promote the site even with his name) or attempting Search engine omptimization, which is pretty sad... The company IS ranked #5 when you search for Actionreaction (Of course, a myspace account beat it...). (And the links to the website itself have ?Wikipedia in their header, which seems like this is something the company itself has been planning, which is sort of like writing a biography about yourself.... of course, ?Whatever isn't anything different than the index... and I can't see if it's a different page since their sitemap is broken). And the article itself is almost copied for the main page of the site. I'd suggest the author finds an indication of meeting WP:CORP before continuing to protest this deletion. Logical2u 17:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Whoooooopwhoopwhoop: It's been userfied.
 * See User:ACTIONREACTION. -- The Anome 17:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * User has now been blocked as per username policy, and the other copy of the article has been deleted as an attempt to circumvent afd process. -- The Anome 17:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.