Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Active Student Response Techniques


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Active Student Response Techniques

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be WP:OR. red dogsix (talk) 23:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * @redddogsix Why does it appear to be WP:OR? It cites review papers and other secondary/tertiary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShawnMozeika (talk • contribs) 00:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Well cited. Bondegezou (talk) 12:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an essay, albeit a well-sourced one. Possibly part of a project at NU. The subject, as it is specifically denoted in the title of the article, is not independently notable. Paraphrasing does not append notability. -The Gnome (talk) 23:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - while poorly written, it is well-cited. Bearian (talk) 15:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep it seems well cited, and a quick google search seems to indicate that this is not some kind of synth essay, but is attempting to represent a real topic. Needs work, not deletion. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  23:26, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep; as Insertcleverphrasehere notes, this is well cited and an actual topic of study in education. --GRuban (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.