Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Active and reactive power in electrical circuit with distributed and lumped parameters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Active and reactive power in electrical circuit with distributed and lumped parameters

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Speedy upgraded to PROD, PROD tag removed. Wikipedia is not a textbook. The tone and style is inappropriate for Wikipedia. If this article is not entirely WP:OR, it is redundant with the pertinent sections of AC power. This almost reads like a translation of a thesis. I am unable to verify the sources given as I don't read any Cryllic. It's an impossible search term or link name. We also have an article Transmission line which is a better place to talk about distributed parameters. Wtshymanski (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom or Merge to an appropriate existing article on transmission line modelling. It is similar to materials already covered in related articles. The article is apparently based a Russian textbook on the topic, and is apparently not written by a fluent speaker of English, so it is difficult to follow. Someone who can read the Russian textbook might check to make sure it is not simply a copyvio. Edison (talk) 23:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. Polyamorph (talk) 10:37, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. This looks like a textbook case of WP:OR.  No way toverify that it is not such. Bearian (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Move to wikiversity or wikibooks.Smallman12q (talk) 00:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.