Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actors who have played multiple roles in the same film


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep & move.  Sango 123  02:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Actors who have played multiple roles in the same film
As with many list articles, this article has both original research and neutral point of view issues. They are clearly present in this article due to the awkward explanation of Michael Keaton's character's inclusion from Multiplicity. Erechtheus 05:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It needs tuning up, but the premise of the list is a legitimate one. Danny Lilithborne 06:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Playing two roles in the same film is hardly original research since entries can be easily verified by looking at the cast for the film. Playing two or more roles is also interesting enough to justify a list here. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The problem appears when the standard is not as simple as looking at credits and adding. Look at the Matrix vs. Multiplicity issue within the page itself for a good example. If kept, I don't believe it possible to continue making that sort of case by case call. There would need to be standards. Erechtheus 06:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. (|--   UlT i MuS  06:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above. The criteria seem to be designed to make this something other than the massive list it could be. BigHaz 07:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, this has the potential to be an interesting list. Shouldn't be OR, per Sjakkalle's reasoning. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 07:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It can be cleaned up to answer the "Multiplicity" objection (I think a simple asterik comment would suffice) but overall I think the content is encylopedic and something that a broad spectrum of readers would find interesting. 205.157.110.11 08:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep could be renamed as a list...? -- Alex  talk here 10:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - encyclopaedic, et cetera. Complains about a single entry in a list shouldn't be taken to AfD. WilyD 12:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Specific enough to warrant an article. 23skidoo 18:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Just needs a lot more additions to become more credible. --Nehrams2020 19:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to List of actors who have played multiple roles in the same film per WP:NAMEGarrie 00:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Move (better to call lists lists) or Keep, per the above comments. Carlossuarez46 22:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.