Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actress (2007 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 23:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Actress (2007 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Film appears to fail the requirements for WP:NFILM. Everything found in a BEFORE was database entries, articles about the release, or interviews mentioning the film.

PROD removed when citation added, but that citation is simply an interview with the director. Donald D23  talk to me  22:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  22:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  22:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: This needs someone who is fluent in Russian to search for sourcing. I'm finding some evidence of coverage in places like this and this, which suggests additional coverage, but I'm kind of at the limit of what Google Translate can do for me. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've left a note at WP:RUSSIA asking if anyone would be willing to search for sourcing - it could very well not be notable, but I'd like for someone fluent to do a search just in case. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a big review in a reliable source--Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a short one but reliable as well.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * One more--Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you ! This would make it a keep on my end, then. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per above sources, which demonstrate sufficient notability. --Michig (talk) 17:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.