Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acts 1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete (G3) as blatant misinformation. — Travis talk  20:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Acts 1

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

10:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no such Jordanian satellite. The article is copied from Ofeq. חובבשירה (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I concur, the article is fake and copied from Ofeq. Notice that the text is almost exactly the same, and the InterWiki links lead nowhere... Barak Sh (talk) 14:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per previous comments. I've warned the user who created the article. okedem (talk) 14:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete seems to be a complete hoax. --Allemandtando (talk) 15:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (even though I de-tagged it as such), pretty obvious that it's either a test or a wind-up. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 16:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Certainly a hoax. Noon (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * you all know the facts. why don't you delete this "article" now, before someone would "learn" from it? נוי (talk) 18:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - HOAX DGtal (talk) 19:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - This Afd should not have been opened, its a SD if there ever was one... 89.139.36.147 (talk) 21:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - As an Israeli who is familiar with it's space program I can count all too many mistakes in it. as an example Palmachim_Airbase. also - one can look in the history section and see that large portions of it were originally copied from from Ofeq. Amirber (talk) 05:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * CSD A7 speedy delete as copyvio and blatant hoax. This is an Israeli Ofeq, not a Jordanian satellite as Amirber notes. Artene50 (talk)
 * Speedy delete that is stuped! you all know it is a hoax and steal don't delite it. נוי (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've re-added the speedy-delete template. This is becoming ridicules. This needs to be deleted immediately, not dragged on and on. There's no argument here - this page is pure and obvious vandalism. okedem (talk) 17:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This doesn’t qualify as patent nonsense, but it does fall under CSD G3 as blatant misinformation. — Travis talk  20:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.