Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acts 29 Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - crz crztalk 18:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Acts 29 Network


Non-notable "church planting network", doesn't assert notability, doesn't even explain what "church planting" is. Categorized as a church even though they aren't one. Fails WP:CORP regardless. wikipediatrix 03:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 03:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete un-encyclopedic drivel. The Crying Orc 08:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete (and yes I do know what church planting is). Guy (Help!) 10:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep gets 39,300 Google hits, and the founder seems to be notable, though the article could use some work. Hut 8.5 18:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's not just the quantity of the hits, but the quality. Most of what I see in those Google results are blogs, ads, and linkspam. However: I did find this, which makes me now reconsider and recommend that Acts 29 Network be Merged into Mars Hill Church. wikipediatrix 18:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * With 39,300 I think it's quite probable that there's at least two decent references in there somewhere, but there's no way anyone could look through them all. A Merge seems like a good idea. Hut 8.5 18:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, there's only 293 unique hits, which is what matters. The only thing that makes me see any notability at all is that the book about Mars Hill is published by Zondervan, a major publisher. wikipediatrix 18:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete -- NN godcruft. Pete Fenelon 01:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.