Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actuarial and Insurance Management Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. -- Nish kid 64 00:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Actuarial and Insurance Management Solutions
Not even a non-notable corporation -- a DIVISION of a larger company (PwC, that is, PriceWaterhouseCoopers). Was prodded, but tag removed by with the summary "because I don't trust the prodder or his judgement" -- one of a series of prod tag removals with the same summary. Note: if you're disrupting Wikipedia to make a point about judgment, you ought to be exercising a bit yourself by actually reading the article and tags. Calton | Talk 01:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. No claim to encyclopedic notability. Appears to have been created on a verrrrry slow day at the office. Vivian - boooo. etc Bwithh 01:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- does CSD A7 apply? Duja 11:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. May indeed be speedyable for lack of context and informative content:  Very little is known about what they do, but it is believed to involve many triangles.  Companies with the words "management" or "solutions" in their names are hardly ever notable. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as per nom and Smerdis of Tlön. Valrith 20:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.